South Sudan
South Sudan exhibits low performance across all categories of the Global State of Democracy (GSoD) framework, and is amongst the bottom 25 per cent of countries with regard to all factors of democracy. While South Sudan is natural resource-rich, its economy is low-income and is nearly entirely dependent on oil-revenue. Agriculture is the second most important sector of its economy and remains the primary source of livelihood for most households. Economic growth has been weak partly due to widespread corruption, prolonged civil conflict and lack of infrastructure. Compared to 2018, South Sudan has experienced significant improvements in Rule of Law, including Judicial Independence and Predictable Enforcement.
The pre-colonial history of South Sudan is largely pieced together through oral traditions. Early inhabitants included mound-builders known as the Luel or Turkwel, followed by the migration of Nilotic groups. Non-Nilotic peoples arrived in the 17th century, creating a diverse society shaped by migration, agropastoralism and social hierarchies. South Sudan was first ruled by Egypt and later jointly by Egyptian-British colonial administrators in the late 19th century. While the north was greatly influenced by Arab-Islamic culture and religion, Christian missionaries helped spread the English language and Christianity in the south, leading to significant cultural differences between the two.
Following Sudan’s independence in 1956, the southern region was promised political inclusion, but unmet assurances led to two civil wars, causing the deaths of millions. A US-backed peace agreement in 2005 granted the South autonomy, and a 2011 referendum resulted in a near-unanimous vote for independence. Following independence, South Sudan has continued to face problems with its neighbor. Although most oil reserves are in South Sudan, the necessary infrastructure for transporting the oil goes through Sudan, causing disagreement around oil revenue sharing. Since independence, South Sudan has been mired in political conflict and ethnic violence, causing a dire human rights and humanitarian crisis. A civil war erupted in 2013 between President Salva Kiir and Vice President Riek Machar, who represent different ethnic groups. Despite peace agreements in 2015 and 2018, respectively, which aimed to establish a power-sharing agreement and form a transitional government, progress has been slow, with recurring violence and delayed implementation. A transitional government was formed in 2020, but wrangling over power-sharing and governance has hindered lasting peace. With elections scheduled for December 2024, the country continues to grapple with a worsening humanitarian crisis and climate-related disasters.
Gender-based violence is widespread and systemic throughout the country. Other issues include low female literacy, insufficient health services, minimal representation of women in political and decision-making processes, and harmful traditional practices, such as early marriage. Government forces and armed groups have also been accused of committing other serious human rights violations and abuses, including extrajudicial executions, state repression, and the recruitment and use of children in armed groups.
Looking ahead, it will be important to monitor the humanitarian and security crisis and its impact on the country’s democratic performance in multiple areas, including Basic Welfare, Political Equality and Personal Integrity and Security. While there remain uncertainties surrounding the feasibility of South Sudan’s December 2024 polls – the country’s first since gaining independence – if materialized, it will be critical to keep a close eye on Credible Elections and Civic Engagement.
Last updated: September 2024
https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/
September 2024
Government postpones elections for the fourth time since independence
On 20 September, South Sudan’s parliament approved a two-year postponement of the long-awaited elections announced by the transitional government on 13 September, citing delays in implementing key provisions of the 2018 peace agreement and insufficient funds to register voters. The elections, originally scheduled for December 2024, are now expected to be held in 2026. This marks the fourth election postponement in the past decade, with South Sudan yet to hold elections since gaining independence in 2011. The decision has drawn sharp criticism from both national and international actors. A group of South Sudanese lawyers petitioned the court, challenging the legality of the postponement, while the United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway – international guarantors of the peace process – issued a joint statement condemning the delay as a failure of leadership.
Sources: Sudan Tribune, Radio Tamazuj, VOA News, Africa Confidential, AP News, International Peace Institute
August 2024
Controversial national security bill becomes law by default
Despite international pressure and objections from opposition parties, the controversial law allowing the country’s National Security Service (NSS) to conduct warrantless arrests was enacted by default after President Salva Kiir’s decision not to sign or veto it. On 3 July, South Sudan’s parliament passed the amended National Security Services Act, criticized for granting broad powers to NSS, including arrest and detention without court oversight for ‘crimes against the state’, a vaguely worded provision that critics argue is often used to suppress freedoms of expression, assembly, and association. The bill also grants the government extensive surveillance capabilities, raising fears of further shrinking of civic space.
Sources: International IDEA, Radio Tamazuj, The Associated Press
July 2024
Country adopts damaging security law revisions
On 3 July, South Sudan’s National Legislative Assembly passed amendments to the National Security Services Act, expanding the powers of the country’s National Security Service (NSS) to arrest and detain people without a warrant. The NSS has been a key instrument of state repression, engaging in surveillance, arbitrary arrests, torture and suppression of dissent. The amendments allow the NSS to arrest individuals for ‘crimes against the state,’ a vaguely worded provision that critics argue is often used to suppress freedoms of expression, assembly, and association, and further place the de facto powers of the NSS on a statutory footing. The law’s adoption disregards recommendations to limit NSS powers to intelligence gathering, as outlined in the Transitional Constitution of 2011. The law now heads to President Salva Kiir, who has 30 days to assent or return it to parliament. Rights groups, opposition members and western countries have urged President Kiir to reject the bill and instead align it with constitutional and international standards.
Sources: Human Rights Watch (1), Human Rights Watch (2), U.S. Embassy in South Sudan, UN Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan, Amnesty International, Radio Tamazuj
January 2024
Violence escalates in disputed region between Sudan and South Sudan
The level of inter-communal violence in the Abyei region (claimed by both Sudan and South Sudan) has been escalating since late 2023. January 2024 was a particularly deadly month in which more than 50 people were killed, including one UN peacekeeper. The current violence relates to the dispute over the boundaries of the region which has been ongoing since South Sudan declared independence in 2011. The region has oil reserves, and two Dinka ethnic groups (Ngok Dinka of Abyei and Twic Dinka of South Sudan’s Warrap state) are contesting the administrative boundaries and revenue arrangements in the region.
Sources: United Nations News, Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, British Broadcasting Corporation
See all event reports for this country
Global ranking per category of democratic performance in 2023
Basic Information
Human Rights Treaties
Performance by category over the last 6 months
Blogs
Global State of Democracy Indices
Hover over the trend lines to see the exact data points across the years
Factors of Democratic Performance Over Time
Use the slider below to see how democratic performance has changed over time