Back to overview

Electoral Redistricting App

Explore how to create electoral districts using the Electoral Redistricting App (ERA).

Electoral Redistricting App (ERA) is a universal technological tool for creating electoral districts that could help inspire an electoral boundary delimitation process that conforms international principles and best practice.

Through this technology, the creation of electoral districts can be done with relative ease at little or no cost. This application allows the utilisation of digital maps and geographic information systems (GIS) by electoral management bodies, boundaries commissions and the general public in systematically guiding the delimitation of electoral boundaries towards fulfilling the principles of 'one person, one vote, one value' (OPOVOV), contiguity and compactness, to name a few.

The use of this Electoral Redistricting App also makes the delimitation of electoral boundaries process more transparent and accessible for anyone interested in researching and advocating for different options of electoral district boundaries.

 
Use the Electoral Redistricting App

 

Electoral districts are an important element of electoral systems. Simply put, electoral districts are arenas within which political parties compete to represent voters by winning seats, as well as arenas for political representation of citizens by political parties. The term ‘boundary delimitation’, often referred to as “redistricting”, refers to the process of forming or updating electoral districts.

Boundary delimitation plays a significant role in both the plurality majority electoral system and systems of proportional representation by maintaining the proportionality of the number of representative seats allocated to an electoral district, as well as upholding the fairness principle in an election.

The main objectives of the boundary delimitation process are to achieve proportionality in the citizen-to-seat ratio in an electoral district under the OPOVOV principle, while also ensuring the cohesiveness and integrity of administrative regions, as well as building political, social and cultural ties between voters and their representatives.

Problems arise where boundary delimitation results in electoral districts that are disproportionate, or even actively contradict the principle of fair elections, for example, in cases of malapportionment or gerrymandering, where electoral districts are intentionally designed to benefit certain electoral participants. Therefore, it's important that boundary delimitation follows the standards and basic principles of electoral districting.

 

Who will benefit from using the Electoral Redistricting App?

The following users will benefit from ERA:

  • Electoral management bodies responsible for forming electoral districts, but not already in possession of an electoral boundary delimitation software.
  • Civil society activists wanting to develop and advocate alternative electoral district boundaries.
  • Political parties looking for a low-cost solution for analysing existing electoral boundaries and for proposing changes.
  • Academic researchers looking for a free-to-use geographical information system software that helps them in researching the effects of changes to electoral boundaries and other related research.   
     

International IDEA's resources

A list of related resources and publications by International IDEA:

Resources from other institutions 

View a non-exhaustive list of external resources and publications:

  1. Election Standards at the Carter Center, Electoral System and Boundary Delimitation 
  2. International Foundation for Electoral Systems, Dr. Lisa Handley, Challenging the Norms and Standards of Election Administration: Boundary Delimitation 
  3. International Foundation for Electoral Systems, Dr. Lisa Handley, Delimitation Equity Project – Resource Guide   
    OSCE, Delimitation and Demarcation of State Boundaries: Challenges and Solutions
  4. CoE, Report on Constituency Delineation and Seat Allocation
  5. Central Election Commission of Lithuania, Case Study Lithuania
  6. Tindak Malaysia, Electoral Boundaries (Hackathon Politik: Rules of The Game)
  7. Tindak Malaysia, Redelineation in the Age of UNDI 18
  8. Tindak Malaysia, Understanding Redelineation
  9. Tindak Malaysia, Case Studies for Redelineation
  10. Australian Election Commission, Federal electoral boundary GIS data
  11. New Zealand Electoral Commission, How are electoral boundaries decided?
  12. Elsevier Journal, Ong, K.-M., et al., Malapportionment and democracy: A curvilinear relationship, Electoral Studies (2017).   
     

Contact International IDEA if any of the information requires corrections or further updates: Ahdy Aman, Senior Programme Manager for Asia & the Pacific, Email: A.Aman@idea.int / Tel.: +61 420 90 3465 

For all press inquiries, contact Alistair Scrutton, Head of Communications, at press@idea.int or Tel: +46 707 211 098 

This page was first published on 27 July 2022 and is updated on a regular basis based on International IDEA's research. 

Submit feedback

Submit questions or comments about the Data or Tool

How did you find out about this? What do you like about it? What did you expect but did not find in using the Data or Tool?

To see how we handle your personal data, please read our Privacy Policy.

Close tooltip