Tagline
Search

Gender Quotas Database

Europe General Resources

  • Antić, M.G and Lokar, S. 2006. ‘The Balkans: from total rejection to gradual acceptance of gender quotas’, in Dahlerup, D. (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 138-167.
  • Freidenvall, L. et al. 2006. “The Nordic Countries: An incremental model”, in Dahlerup, D. (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 55-82.
  • Krook, M.L. et al 2006. ’Western Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand: Gender Quotas in the Context of Citizenship Models’, in Dahlerup, D. (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 194-221.
  • Dahlerup, D. and Freidenvall, L. 2005. ‘Quotas as a Fast Track to Equal Representation for Women’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7, 1: 1–22.
  • Lovenduski, J. 2005. ‘Introduction: state feminism and the political
    representation of women’, in Lovenduski, J. et al (eds) State Feminism and Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-19. 
  • Lovenduski, J. 2005. Feminizing Politics, Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
  • Centre for Educational Policy Studies (CEPS) 2004. Online. Available at: http://ceps.pef.uni-lj.si/
  • Dahlerup, D. 2004. ‘Continuity and Waves in the Feminist Movement – A Challenge to Social Movement Theory’, in H. Römer Christensen, B. Halsaa and A. Saarinen (eds) Crossing Borders: Remapping Women’s Movements at the Turn of the 21st Century, Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, pp. 59–78.
  • Gender Network at European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, 2004. Online. Available at: http://www.europeanforum.net/gender_network.php
  • Htun, M. 2004. ‘Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups’, Perspectives on Politics, 2, 3: 439–58.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2004. ‘Human Development Report 2004’.
  • Znanstveno raziskovalni center pri SAZU, 2004. www.odmev.zrc-sazu.si/zrc/
  • Dahlerup, D. and Freidenvall, L. ‘Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Political Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model’, paper presented at the 19th International Political Science Association World Congress, Durban, South Africa, June–July 2003.
  • Glaurdić, J. 2003. ‘Croatia’s Leap towards Political Equality: Rules and Players’, in R. Matland and K. Montgomery (eds) Women’s Access to Power in Post Communist Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 285–303.
  • Matland, R. and Montgomery K. (eds) 2003Women’s Access to Power in Post Communist Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ristova, K. 2003. ‘Establishing a Machocracy: Women and Elections in Macedonia (1990–8)’, in R. Matland and K. Montgomery (eds) Women’s Access to Power inPost Communist Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 196–216.
  • Sgier, L. ‘Political Representation and Gender Quotas’, paper presented at the European Consortium of Politics Research, Joint Sessions of Workshops, Edinburgh, March–April 2003.
  • Taarup, N.A. 2003. ‘International Implementation of Electoral Gender Quotas in the Balkans: A Fact-Finding Report’, The Research Program on Gender Quotas. Working Paper Series 2003: 1. Stockholm University: Department of Political Science.
  • Lijphart, A. 2002. ‘The Evolution of Consociational Theory and Consociational Practices 1965–2000’, Acta Politica, 37: 11–22.
  • Lokar, S. 2002. ‘Introduction’, in Women Can Do It II, Integration of gender equality issues in parliamentary parties work in South East Europe, Project Report, Novi sad: Stability Pact Gender Task Force, pp. 5–11.
  • Mastnak, T. 1992. Vzhodno od raja, Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije. Jalušič, V. (ed.) (2002) Kako smo hodile v feministično gimnazijo, Ljubljana: Založba/*cf.
  • McDonagh, E. 2002. ‘Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox’, American Political Science Review, 96, 3: 535–52.
  • Royo, S. 2002. A New Century of Corporatism?: Corporatism in Southern Europe, Westport: Praeger.
  • Schopflin, G. 2002. Nations, Identity, Power, London: Hurst.
  • Giraud, I. and Jenson, J. 2001. ‘Constitutionalising Equal Access: High Hopes, Dashed Hopes?’, in J. Klausen and C.S. Maier (eds) Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, New York: Palgrave, pp. 69–88.
  • Gomard, K. and Krogstad, A. (eds) 2001. Instead of the Ideal Debate. Doing Politics
    and Doing Gender in Nordic Political Campaign Discourse, Gylling: Aarhus University
    Press.
  • Jalušič, V. and Antić, M.G. 2001. Women – Politics – Equal Opportunities: Prospects for Gender Equality Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, Ljubljana: Peace Institute.
  • Jogan, M. 2001. Seksizem v vsakdanjem življenju, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
  • Kaiser, P. 2001. Strategic Predictors of Women’s Parliamentary Participation: A Comparative Study of Twenty-Three Democracies, PhD dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California.
  • Klausen, J. and Maier, C.S. (eds) 2001. Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, New York: Palgrave.
  • Skjeie, H. 2001. ‘Quotas, Parity and the Discursive Dangers of Difference’ in C.S. Maier and J. Klausen (eds) Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and in the United States, New York: Palgrave, pp. 165–76.
  • Woodward, A. 2001. ‘Women are Doing It’ – building a Gender Balanced Democracy using Sticks, Carrots and Kisses’, in M.A. Rukavina (ed.) Building national gender equality mechanisms in South East Europe: Women’s use of the state: 1999–2001, Ljubljana: Stability Pact Gender Task Force, pp. 42–6.
  • Antić, M.G. 2000. ‘Ne-srečno razmerje: strankarska politika in ženske v državah vzhodne srednje Evrope’, Družboslovne razprave, 34–5: 127–40.
  • Blagojević, M. (ed.) 2000. Mapiranje misoginije u Srbiji, diskurzi i prakse, Beograd: ANžIN – Asociacija za žensku iniciativu.
  • Dojčinović-Nešić, B. 2000. ‘Feminizam: Predrasude, stereotipi i negativni stavovi’, in M. Blagojević (ed.) Mapiranje misoginije u Srbiji, diskurzi i prakse, Beograd: ANžIN – Asociacija za žensku iniciativu, pp. 619–32.
  • Einhorn, Barbara. 2000. ‘Gender and Citizenship in the Context of Democratisation and Economic Transformation in East Central Europe.’ Shirin M. Rai (ed). International Perspectives on Gender and Democratisation. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 103-124.
  • Freedman, J. 2000. A Room at a Time: How Women Entered Party Politics, New York:
    Rowman & Littlefield.
  • International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF-HR). 2000. Women 2000: An Investigation into the Status of Women's Rights in the Former Soviet Union and South-Eastern Europe. Vienna: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights.
  • Jalusic, Vlasta and Milica Antic. 2000. Prospects for Gender Equality Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences.
  • Muslin, M. (ed.) 2000. žene Hrvatske u brojkama, Zagreb: Povjerenstvo Vlade Republike Hrvatske za pitanje jednakosti spolova.
  • Skjeie, H. and Siim, B. 2000. ‘Scandinavian Feminist Debates on Citizenship’, International Political Science Review, 21, 4: 345–60.
  • Teigen, M. 2000. ‘The Affirmative action controversy’, NORA ( Nordic Journal of
    Women’s Studies), 8, 2: 63–77.
  • Vode, A. 2000. Spomin in pozaba, Ljubljana: Krtina.
  • Antić, M.G. 1999. ‘Slabosti obstoječe variante sistema sorazmernega predstavništva z vidika izvolitvenih možnosti žensk’, in M.G. Antić and J. Jeram (eds) ženske, politika, demokracija: Za večjo prisotnost žensk v politiki, Ljubljana: Urad za žensko politiko, pp. 171–91.
  • Antić, M.G. and Jeram, J. (eds) 1999. ženske, politika, demokracija: Za večjo prisotnost žensk v politiki, Ljubljana: Urad za žensko politiko.
  • Bergqvist, C. et al. (eds) 1999. Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic
    Countries, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
  • Gaber, S. 1999. ‘Reprezentativnost kot problem sodobnih demokracij’, in M.G. Antić and J. Jeram (eds) ženske, politika, demokracija: za večjo prisotnost žensk v politiki, Ljubljana: Urad za žensko politiko, pp. 85–100.
  • Inhetveen, K. 1999. ‘Can Gender Equality be Institutionalised? The Role of Launching Values in Institutional Innovation’, International Sociology, 14, 4: 403–42.
  • Ramet, P.S. (ed.) 1999. Gender Politics in the western Balkans: Women, Society andPolitics in Yugoslavia and the Yugoslav Successor States, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Vode, A. 1999. Značaj in usoda, Ljubljana: Krtina.
  • Antić, M.G. 1998. ženske v parlamentu, Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče.
  • Dahlerup, D. 1998b. ‘Using Quotas to Increase Women’s Political Representation’, in A. Karam (ed.) Women in Parliament. Beyond Numbers, Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 91–106.
  • Matland, R. 1998. ‘Enhancing Women’s Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems’, in A. Karam (ed.) Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 65–88.
  • Rueschmeyer, Marilyn (ed.). 1998. Women in the Politics of Postcommunist Eastern Europe. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
  • Vode, A. 1998. Spol in upor, Ljubljana: Krtina.
  • Rizman, R. 1997. Izzivi odprte družbe, Ljubljana: Liberalna akdemija.
  • Ule, M. and Rener, T. 1997. ‘Nationalism and Gender in Postsocialist Societies: is Nationalism Female?’, in T. Renne (ed.) Ana’s Land: Sisterhood in Eastern Europe, Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 220–33.
  • Sainsbury, D. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sklevicky, L. and Rihtman D.A. (ed.) 1996. Konji, žene i ratovi, Zagreb: ženska infoteka.
  • Štrajn, D. (ed.) 1995. Meje demokracije, Ljubljana: Liberalna akdemija.
  • Bergqvist, C. 1995. ‘The Declining corporatist state and the political gender dimension’, in L. Karvonen and P. Selle (eds) Women in Nordic Politics: Closing the Gap, Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 205–28.
  • Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity and Race, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Waylen, Georgina. 1994. ‘Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics.’ World Politics 46, no.3. pp. 327-354.
  • Bahovec, E.D. (ed.) 1993. časopis za kritiko znanosti, domišljijo in novo antropologijo, Special Edition: Od ženskih študij k feministični teoriji, Ljubljana: študentska organizacija Univerze v Ljubljani.
  • Funk, A. and Mueller, M. (eds) 1993. Gender Politics and Postcommunism, New York: Routledge.
  • Lovenduski, J. 1993. ‘Introduction: the Dynamics of Gender and Party’, in J. Lovenduski and P. Norris (eds) Gender and Party Politics, London: Sage, pp. 1–15.
  • Antić, M.G. 1992. ‘Yugoslavia’, in C. Corrin (ed.) Superwomen and Double Burden: Women’s Experience of Change in Central and Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union, London: Scarlet Press, pp. 155–79.
  • Ivančič, I., Jančić, P. and Zupanič, J. 1992. ‘Matere in ostale ne-enakovredne ženske?’, Daily Večer, Maribor, 6 March, p. 2.
  • Antić, M.G. 1991. ‘Yugoslavia: Democracy between Tyranny and Liberty: The Situation of Women in the Post-’socialist’ Nation State’, Feminist Review, Special Issue: Shifting Territories: Feminism, Socialism, Europe, 39: 148.
  • Bahovec, E.D. (ed.) 1991. Abortus – pravica do izbire?!, Ljubljana: Skupina ženske
    za politiko.
  • Castles, F.G. and Sainsbury, D. 1990. ‘Politics in Scandinavia’, in R.C. Macridis (ed.) Modern Political Systems: Europe, 7th edn, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 281–327.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton NJ:
    Princeton University Press.
  • Gelb, J. 1989. Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective, Berkeley: University
    of California Press.
  • Papić, ž. 1989. Sociologija i Feminizam, Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije.
  • Pateman, C. 1989. The Disorder of Women, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Dahlerup, D. 1988a. ‘From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 11, 4: 275–98.
  • Dahlerup, D. 1988b. Vi har ventet længe nok – håndbog i kvinderepræsentation, Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd.
  • Hernes, H. 1987. Welfare State and Women Power: Essays in State Feminism, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
  • Norris, P. 1987. Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in
    Western Democracies, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
  • Rule, W. 1987. ‘Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women’s Opportunity for
    Elections to Parliament in Twenty-three Democracies’, The Western Political Quarterly,
    40, 3: 477–98.
  • Jogan, M. 1986. ženske in diskriminacija, Ljubljana: Delavska enotnost.
  • Haavio-Mannila, E. et al. (eds) 1985. Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics, New York: Pergamon.
  • Rule, W. 1981. ‘The Critical Contextual Factors in Women’s Legislative Recruitment’,
    Western Political Quarterly, 34: 60–77.
  • Schmitter, P. 1979. ‘Still the century of corporatism?’, in P. Schmitter and G. Lembruch (eds) Trends towards corporatist intermediation, London: Sage.
  • Tomšič, V. 1978. ž enska, delo, družina, družba, Ljubljana: Komunist.
  • Čalovska, L. and Jančić-Starc, J. (eds) 1975. Socializem in osvoboditev žensk, Ljubljana: Komunist.
  • Andersen, K. 1975. ‘Working Women and Political Participation, 1952–1972’,
    American Journal of Political Science, 19: 439–55.
  • Election World, www.electionworld.org
  • Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), www.ipu.org
  • International foundation on Election Systems, www.ifes.org
  • International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, www.ihf-hr.org
  • International Parliamentary Union (IPU), www.ipu.org
  • Jacquette, Jane and Sharon L. Wolchik: Women and Democracy. Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lovenduski, J. et al (eds) State Feminism and Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mirovni inštitut (Peace Institute), http://www.mirovni-institut.si
  • Socialist International Women. ‘The Quota System: www.socintwomen.org.uk/QUOTA/QUOTAEng1.html
  • Socialist International Women. ‘The Quota System.’ www.socintwomen.org.uk/QUOTA/QUOTAEng1.html    

Submit feedback

Submit questions or comments about the Data or Tool

How did you find out about this? What do you like about it? What did you expect but did not find in using the Data or Tool?

To see how we handle your personal data, please read our Privacy Policy.

Close tooltip